Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

LIFE Report - Basic Needs

View all indicators from the Basic Needs section of the Marathon County LIFE Report.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Marathon

Hunger

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Hunger

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Food Share Recipients

Current Value:

County: Marathon Food Share Recipients

18,741
Number of recipients
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (18,741) is greater  than the previously measured value (18,377).
Prior Value
(18,377)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Marathon Food Insecurity Rate

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (10.5%), Marathon has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Marathon has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (9.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Marathon Child Food Insecurity Rate

14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (16.5%), Marathon has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Marathon has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (14.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
31.5%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.2%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (36.0%), Marathon has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Marathon has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (31.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

38%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 38% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 38% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (33%), Marathon has a value of 38% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(33%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Marathon has a value of 38% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (38%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25%).
Prior Value
(25%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Teens Who Experienced Hunger Due To Lack Of Food At Home (High School)

23%
Percent of high school students
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the WI Value (22%), Marathon has a value of 23% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(22%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (23%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24%).
Prior Value
(24%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Marathon Individuals Provided Food Through Marathon County Hunger Coalition Partner Pantries

87,799
Number of Individuals Served
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (87,799) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (60,970).
Prior Value
(60,970)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Amount of Food Donated to Food Pantries

Current Value:
2,800,000
Pounds
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (2,800,000) is less and worse than the previously measured value (3,600,000).
Prior Value
(3,600,000)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Marathon

Housing Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Housing Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

42.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 42.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 42.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (43.1%), Marathon has a value of 42.9% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(43.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Marathon has a value of 42.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Marathon Marathon County Residents Housing Expenses

Current Value:
49%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (49%) is less and better than the previously measured value (54%).
Prior Value
(54%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Marathon Severe Housing Problems

10.9%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Marathon has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marathon has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (12.9%), Marathon has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Marathon has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Number of Housing Assistance Requests Reported by United Way 2-1-1

990
Number of Requests
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (990) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,654).
Prior Value
(2,654)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Number of Households Receiving Emergency Housing Assistance Funds (EHAF)

242
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (242) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (240).
Prior Value
(240)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Number of Units with Available Funding for the Housing Choice Voucher Program

276
Number of Housing Units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (276) is greater and better than the previously measured value (263).
Prior Value
(263)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon

Homelessness

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Homelessness

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Number of Individuals Sheltered

Current Value:
594
Number of Individuals
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (594) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (412).
Prior Value
(412)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Number of Lodging Nights

Current Value:

County: Marathon Number of Lodging Nights

166
Number of Nights
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (166) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (149).
Prior Value
(149)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Point-in-Time Homeless Counts

Current Value:
147
Number of Individuals
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (147) is less and better than the previously measured value (221).
Prior Value
(221)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon

Housing Options for Aging

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Housing Options for Aging

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Marathon Population Over Age 65

19.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the WI Value (19.1%), Marathon has a value of 19.7%.
WI Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Marathon has a value of 19.7%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (19.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon

Unmet Basic Needs

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Unmet Basic Needs

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Number of 211 Basic Needs Requests

Current Value:
5,874
Number of Requests
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (5,874) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,981).
Prior Value
(4,981)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon Marathon County Residents without Savings

Current Value:
36%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (36%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42%).
Prior Value
(42%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Marathon

Household Utilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon

Household Utilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Marathon Number of Households with Utility Assistance

Current Value:
4,147
Number of households
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Marathon (4,147) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,696).
Prior Value
(3,696)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marathon value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.